From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a24:30c7:: with SMTP id q190mr683507itq.20.1552356264657;
        Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:30d1:: with SMTP id
 r17mr20932639otg.269.1552356264301;
 Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!fdn.fr!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.166.216.MISMATCH!82no55921itk.0!news-out.google.com!d79ni67itc.0!nntp.google.com!82no55919itk.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <q66m95$8ri$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5
References: <b196da6e-4614-42f9-9147-b1708c6e5094@googlegroups.com>
 <c16f6c7d-34d9-4d7e-96e6-9c00e387b2a9@googlegroups.com>
 <q66m95$8ri$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <a534f338-a418-424e-8043-31c738682807@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Intervention needed?
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 02:04:24 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55843
Date: 2019-03-11T19:04:23-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, 11 March 2019 22:08:38 UTC, Jeffrey R. Carter  wrote:
> On 3/11/19 4:34 PM, Lucretia wrote:
>  > On Friday, 8 March 2019 16:43:50 UTC, Olivier Henley  wrote:
>  >> Maybe someone with all the proper ammunitions could enlighten this user:
>  >>
>  >> https://users.rust-lang.org/t/if-ada-is-already-very-safe-why-rust/21911/11
>  >
>  > Just tore them a new one :)
> 
> As far as I can see, Rust's only innovation is safer pointers, but it still has 
> a bad design that requires the use of pointers. In Ada, pointers are never 
> needed.* So Ada is still safer when dealing with pointers, since you never need to.
> 
> Other than that, Rust seems to be a typical C-family language with all the 
> dangers that implies. So Ada is significantly safer there, too.
> 
> *1st-order approximation. Probably 2nd and 3rd, too

Go on that thread and explain that to them.