From: Warren <ve3wwg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Generic Embedded List Nodes
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 13:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2016-06-19T13:13:38-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4e0e20a-5e94-49c9-922e-5aa12582cb2c@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nk6qb1$8k4$2@gioia.aioe.org>
On Sunday, 19 June 2016 15:04:05 UTC-4, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> Maybe I don't understand the problem, but it seems you want externally
> linked objects that themselves were of any type.
Close, but not quite. I had been toying with the idea that each node point back to the containing object, but I've dropped that clumsy idea now.
Now I am back to the original C idea of converting a Node reference back to its containing object through pointer arithmetic (I know: Ada fans gasping). In short, given a Node, I need to get its containing Object.
> The best way to do it is IMO a custom memory pool.
The problem I have with that is performance. For example deleting a node from a list.
procedure Delete
( Brand : List_Identification_Type;
Container : in out Web;
Element : in out Node
);
To delete the node, in the worst case, requires traversing the entire list. My lists can be 30,000+ long.
In the embedded node case, I already have direct access to the affected link node. To remove the node from a list I simply say:
R.Link_Node.Unlink;
and it removes itself out of the doubly linked list (else does nothing if not already in a list).
I have considered a memory pool and not ruled it out.
Presently I have an generic Object_Of(Node) function working, which makes use of System.Storage_Elements."+" (gasp!) The only drawback is that I need a fake instance of the Object to determine Node'Position at startup.
Warren
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-19 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-18 22:52 Generic Embedded List Nodes Warren
2016-06-18 23:40 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-06-19 2:15 ` Warren
2016-06-19 3:04 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-06-19 2:14 ` Jeremiah
2016-06-19 2:21 ` Warren
2016-06-19 2:50 ` Warren
2016-06-19 4:45 ` Simon Wright
2016-06-19 18:27 ` Warren
2016-06-19 19:04 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-06-19 20:13 ` Warren [this message]
2016-06-19 20:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-06-20 2:42 ` Warren
2016-06-20 7:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-06-20 12:26 ` Warren
2016-06-20 19:33 ` Niklas Holsti
2016-06-21 2:20 ` Warren
2016-06-21 5:52 ` Niklas Holsti
2016-06-21 7:15 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-06-21 18:54 ` Niklas Holsti
2016-06-21 19:54 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-06-21 10:31 ` Warren
2016-06-21 17:13 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2016-06-21 18:56 ` Niklas Holsti
2016-06-21 20:13 ` Warren
2016-06-21 21:38 ` Niklas Holsti
2016-06-23 2:12 ` Warren
2016-06-23 8:19 ` Niklas Holsti
2016-06-23 12:37 ` Warren
2016-06-23 15:36 ` Niklas Holsti
2016-06-24 1:55 ` Warren
2016-06-24 12:49 ` Warren
2016-06-25 5:50 ` Niklas Holsti
2016-06-26 1:36 ` Warren
2016-07-01 13:49 ` Warren
2016-07-01 16:28 ` Warren
2016-06-24 20:25 ` Warren
2016-06-22 13:01 ` G.B.
2016-06-23 2:30 ` Warren
2016-06-20 6:08 ` Niklas Holsti
2016-06-20 12:20 ` Warren
2016-06-20 19:47 ` Shark8
2016-06-21 2:28 ` Warren
2016-06-21 7:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-06-21 10:32 ` Warren
2016-06-21 11:56 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-06-21 13:39 ` Warren
2016-06-21 14:04 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-06-23 0:37 ` Randy Brukardt
2016-06-23 2:25 ` Warren
2016-07-01 19:50 ` brbarkstrom
2016-07-02 1:55 ` Warren
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox