From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,1d2fc55e2c7a55b6 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!h2g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Maciej Sobczak Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT 2009, Windows and system libraries Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:35:31 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <690a26b0-70fd-4d0c-8169-fe803594938d@z17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 137.138.182.236 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1265816132 6351 127.0.0.1 (10 Feb 2010 15:35:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:35:32 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: h2g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=137.138.182.236; posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20091221 Firefox/3.5.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9088 Date: 2010-02-10T07:35:31-08:00 List-Id: On 10 Lut, 16:21, Maciej Sobczak wrote: > After struggling a while, I was able to compile everything by hand - > that is, by manually running the GNAT toolchain. > The problem with the use of .gpr files is that in the final incovation > of gnatlink, libraries are listed in the order that comes from the > depth-first traversal of all .gpr files that are connected by "with" > relationships, which leads to unresolved references. The order that I > need is depth-first (or more generally, topologically sorted). What a mess above. :-) Final update: I was able to get the clean compile with proper order of "with" clauses in .gpr files. The only curiosity is that libraries are passed to linker in the order that is *reverse* to the order of relevant "with" statements. I'm not sure if that was intended, but as long as I can control the results, it is just a minor detail. -- Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com