From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3e341f7795ed8bda X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.224.59.73 with SMTP id k9mr463638qah.4.1343276903103; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.85.162 with SMTP id i2mr1506582paz.30.1343276903033; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 21:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Path: a15ni101900513qag.0!nntp.google.com!q21no8125053qas.0!news-out.google.com!b9ni60415685pbl.0!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ctu-peer!ctu-gate!news.nctu.edu.tw!usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Shark8 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: pragma Convention() Ada2012 Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 22:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <1olyz5p5952ya.i7joo9fs065h.dlg@40tude.net> <87vchgu8w7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.20.190.126 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1342934245 29605 127.0.0.1 (22 Jul 2012 05:17:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 05:17:25 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87vchgu8w7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.20.190.126; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Received-Bytes: 1708 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-07-21T22:17:24-07:00 List-Id: On Saturday, July 21, 2012 3:00:40 PM UTC-6, Florian Weimer wrote: > > I don't think this is possible in general because the entity has > usually been frozen at that point. I think you're right; the Specification file *must* be able to provide the correct information on generating subprogram-calls, which is impacted by conventions, but I know you can put the convention-pragmas in the private section.