From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,99c3f341deeb2ba1
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!u30g2000prd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Overload of functions in a task stack
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 16:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <a4179dee-f23c-489b-9695-166460597b1b@u30g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <3d6d6fdc-83a5-41c1-b297-dace3051ff3b@o14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 149.32.224.33
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1272930812 29337 127.0.0.1 (3 May 2010 23:53:32
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 23:53:32 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: u30g2000prd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=149.32.224.33;
	posting-account=Qh2kiQoAAADpCLlhT_KTYoGO8dU3n4I6
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
	GTB6; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR
	3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; InfoPath.2),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11307
Date: 2010-05-03T16:53:32-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On May 3, 10:57=A0am, Pablo <pablit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a function called Answer defined in several packages (each one
> is different according to the own package), and each function Answer
> is called by a permanent task every cycle. The issue is that when I
> compile some packages, the compiler bugs me informing "warning:
> declaration of "Answer" hides one at (...)". So, is there a way to
> define these overload functions in a "secure" way that I do not need
> to use pragma Warnings (OFF) to avoid these warnings?
> Thanks

I believe use Clause of more than one package containing function
Answer is involved. The simple fix is to replace use Clause with full
qualification.

Anh Vo