From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,57d25404e12d2837 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-04 00:57:43 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!not-for-mail From: "Alexander Boucke" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to catch NaNs with gnat3.14p Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 09:57:38 +0100 Organization: Lehr- und Forschungsgebiet f. Mechanik Message-ID: References: <5ee5b646.0202012221.17665dfb@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.130.177.111 X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 1012813063 9702 134.130.177.111 (4 Feb 2002 08:57:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@rwth-aachen.de NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Feb 2002 08:57:43 GMT X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express Unix 5.00.2013.1312 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2013.1312 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19578 Date: 2002-02-04T08:57:43+00:00 List-Id: Thanks, that was the Answer I was looking for... Regards, Alexander Robert Dewar wrote in message > >And indeed this is true, but your original code had no >range checks, since you had only unconstrained floating-point types, >so obviously such a program is >unaffected by a change in the behavior of range checks!