From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,57d25404e12d2837 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-01 08:10:33 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!not-for-mail From: "Alexander Boucke" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to catch NaNs with gnat3.14p Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 17:10:28 +0100 Organization: Lehr- und Forschungsgebiet f. Mechanik Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 134.130.177.111 X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 1012579830 10138 134.130.177.111 (1 Feb 2002 16:10:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@rwth-aachen.de NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Feb 2002 16:10:30 GMT X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express Unix 5.00.2013.1312 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2013.1312 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19486 Date: 2002-02-01T16:10:30+00:00 List-Id: yes, -gnato says it's only for integers. But using -gnato is my default, since this enables all runtime checks unsing gnat (as intended by the RM). And since I did not exclude any checks using a pragma, all possible checks should now be enabled. Alexander