From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2d69f4a8070dd707
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-31 10:19:59 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!eusc.inter.net!news.eusc.inter.net!boavista.snafu.de!news
From: Michael Erdmann <michael.erdmann@snafu.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.Networks.Sockets hierarchy for standardization?
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 19:24:25 +0200
Organization: [Posted via] Inter.net Germany GmbH
Message-ID: <a35nq-653.ln1@boavista.snafu.de>
References: <3ED83712.8090905@cogeco.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.eusc.inter.net 1054401599 11518 213.73.70.179 (31 May 2003
 17:19:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@eusc.inter.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <3ED83712.8090905@cogeco.ca>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38230
Date: 2003-05-31T19:24:25+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Warren W. Gay VE3WWG wrote:
> For discussion: I have thrown together this evening
> a more formalized view of some "chicken scratching" I did on my
> train commute home this evening. The diagram is available at my
> web site (see PDF link further on).

I like it. But may be the names services should be put under
Services.

Maybe i have missed it, but what is the difference between red
and black boxes?


Michael