From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,677963b1aa23e668
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!t8g2000vbd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Lucretia <Lucretia9000@yahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What's stopping you from using Ada for your next commercial
 project?
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 16:38:48 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <a2dbc337-7023-4cf7-90ce-ff8f7093cbea@t8g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <fb3979d4-0335-474f-a62e-f71641969da8@p24g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
 <dab11bae-5b63-485f-bdea-aa73f569e303@17g2000prr.googlegroups.com>
 <m2r5aguis4.fsf@pushface.org>
 <eec8247f-77e8-4f8a-9d2d-442b6211bf8f@i3g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.194.162.198
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1299717529 22722 127.0.0.1 (10 Mar 2011 00:38:49
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:38:49 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: t8g2000vbd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=90.194.162.198;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.14)
 Gecko/20110221 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.14,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18987
Date: 2011-03-09T16:38:48-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mar 9, 10:04=A0pm, Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homep...@gmail.com> wrote:

> $ find . -name '*.ad[bs]' | xargs grep workaround
>
> there are 57 entries.
>
> I estimate that this additional effort was somewhere between 33% and
> 50% of the whole work.

> mentioned that I need Ada 2005 features. Rational is out of question

This sounds like interfaces which have been problematic since they
first introduced them. Don't know what 4.6 is like though.

Luke.