From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,587e0e0a16d65b10
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q9g2000yqc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Invade wikipedia!
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:01:21 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <a2261439-4325-4df2-9664-3f49fbf5cdcb@q9g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
References: <l6k0og.o0o.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <go4gqp$5nj$1@octagram.motzarella.org>
	<gir5og.o5s.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <go66s6$m76$1@octagram.motzarella.org>
	<49a6d506$0$32680$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <4a18f335-30f6-4216-8376-0310eb560445@p11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
	<49a7ced2$0$31342$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <t0tq29ariugm.aftb8vcp4aeg$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<goahsr$qul$1@octagram.motzarella.org> <P%4ql.591174$yE1.352310@attbi_s21>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.75.149.247
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1235804482 9837 127.0.0.1 (28 Feb 2009 07:01:22
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:01:22 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q9g2000yqc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.75.149.247;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4814
Date: 2009-02-27T23:01:21-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 28 f=E9v, 07:40, "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter....@spam.acm.org>
wrote:
> Ivan Levashew wrote:
> I understand the thinking behind this, and have considered doing it, but =
it
> doesn't seem to work well when exiting from a loop other than the innermo=
st loop.
>
> --
> Jeff Carter

Why so ? Doesn't work well ?
If you have multiple loops nested loop, you may wish to use named
loop, as in

Label1: loop
   ....
   do the stuff
   Label2: loop
      ...
      do the other inner stuff
      ...
   exit Label2 when ConditionA;
      ...
exit Label1 when ConditionB;
      ...
   end loop Label2;
   ...
exit Label1 when ConditionC;
   ...
end loop Label1;


A syntax highlighter make things looks even more clear (ex. "exit" may
be displayed as bold text)