From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e994501f4ce77c5e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-15 08:04:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!nntp.service.ohio-state.edu!not-for-mail From: "hongxun lee" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: free Ada compiler ? Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:13:55 -0500 Organization: Ohio State University Sender: lee.1801@dhcp-164-107-57-52.ceegs.ohio-state.edu Message-ID: References: <5ee5b646.0201141951.43f36960@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp-164-107-57-52.ceegs.ohio-state.edu X-Trace: charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu 1011110665 19739 164.107.57.52 (15 Jan 2002 16:04:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@osu.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Jan 2002 16:04:25 GMT X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18935 Date: 2002-01-15T16:04:25+00:00 List-Id: Thanks Stephe i read the docs there though i can't really figure out the diff yet. My Q really is that i want to use the unix version Ada compiler (i've been using the windows version for a while) without losing the convenience of windows. Does MinGW make sense ? "Stephen Leake" wrote in message news:upu4bd6lg.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov... > "hongxun lee" writes: > > > A stupid Q: what's mingwin? i saw it very recently. Something similar to > > Cygwin? > > http://www.mingw.org/ > > MinGW (the "win" was changed to "w" a while ago) is a binding to the > Windows API, that uses POSIX-ish names. It lets POSIX-ish programs > (like the Gnu tools) be compiled for the native Windows runtime, > without any additional code. > > Cygwin is similar, but adds code to do some emulation stuff for pipes, > file system links, and other stuff not present in the Windows runtime. > So Cygwin can support a broader range of applications, but Mingw is > lighter weight. > > -- > -- Stephe