From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fc52c633190162e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: why learn C? References: <1172144043.746296.44680@m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <1172161751.573558.24140@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <546qkhF1tr7dtU1@mid.individual.net> <5ZULh.48$YL5.40@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net> <1175215906.645110.217810@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> <1175230700.925143.28490@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <6XbPh.4025$u03.802@newssvr21.news.prodigy.net> <1175491660.511530.58430@y80g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <1175566924.442636.199470@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <1reb6r7o5dbxg$.jd6d0xjy6146$.dlg@40tude.net> <1176411242.5632.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1xmqt5mhqm6x1.xqkti6xl4ps2$.dlg@40tude.net> <1176414046.5632.61.camel@localhost.localdomain> From: Markus E Leypold Organization: N/A Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 02:32:36 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bmU7dx7FRkYNuv+JPzO9zuAp0P4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.204.82 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1176423911 88.72.204.82 (13 Apr 2007 02:25:11 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!62.216.30.27.MISMATCH!newsgate.cistron.nl!xs4all!news2.euro.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.germany.com!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15000 Date: 2007-04-13T02:32:36+02:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus writes: > On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 22:33 +0200, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: >> I can build hardware for floating-point >> >> numbers with the radix e. >> > >> > Will radix e hardware be digital hardware? >> >> Why not? It is just about representation of numbers in the form >> >> X = sum Xk e**k >> >> That's computable. > > Hm. Are you saying that e is computable using digital hardware > in finite time? As much as I disklike Dmitry's disgressions in the obscure and wonderful: But here he is right: A real number representation (X_n, ... X_0 ..., X_u) means X = sum X_k e**k has a well defined meaning and those number representations can be manipulated in finite time by some algorithm (hard or software) that the operation corresponds to multiplication or addition. The representations are just a bit long -- but so are those handled by arbitrary precision libraries like GMP. And of course it tedious to convert those representations to "normal" floats and most natural numbers have no (that is no finite representation) in that system. Fortunately 'e' has a finite representation - '1'. Regards -- Markus