From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab436e97ff76821f X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.223.73 with SMTP id qs9mr24180809pbc.7.1341910811306; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 02:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni11304pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Ada novice Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Does Ada need elemental functions to make it suitable for scientific work? Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <18c77859-480c-41f5-bb1c-df7ad067f4f3@googlegroups.com> <637de084-0e71-4077-a1c5-fc4200cad3cf@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.240.232.139 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1341910811 25795 127.0.0.1 (10 Jul 2012 09:00:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:00:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nma@12000.org In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=130.240.232.139; posting-account=Rr9I-QoAAACS-nOzpA-mGxtAlZ46Nb6I User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-07-10T01:58:55-07:00 List-Id: On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 9:39:58 AM UTC+1, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: > That is a start. But not enough by any means. All functions should be > vectorized. Even user defined ones. > Good examples to illustrate what other mathematical languages offer and what people doing calculations may be / are missing daily with Ada. Let's hope for some changes in this respect in the next Ada standard. YC