From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.129.163.6 with SMTP id a6mr12408441ywh.31.1469380482209; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:14:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.5.98 with SMTP id 89mr705700otw.9.1469380482169; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:14:42 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!c52no4603156qte.1!news-out.google.com!d130ni13215ith.0!nntp.google.com!f6no4203525ith.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:14:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.178.28.115; posting-account=Zsf4jwoAAADEqwCydv835KU9-S3h_Y26 NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.178.28.115 References: <3e02dbb0-69e3-429b-b8c5-d4762dbeb187@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Exception traceback when using TDM-GCC 5.1.0-3 From: jrmarino Injection-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:14:42 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Received-Bytes: 2089 X-Received-Body-CRC: 346831121 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:31142 Date: 2016-07-24T10:14:41-07:00 List-Id: On Sunday, July 24, 2016 at 4:44:27 AM UTC-5, Simon Wright wrote: > ahlan.marriott@gmail.com writes: > > > The Call stack traceback locations are what I was expecting but > > unfortunately are missing when I raise an exception. > > So the question is why. > > Do you compile or build with different switches than me? > > >gnatmake -g -f ce.adb -bargs -E > > (-f only to force the recompilation) > > No idea why ... I had the same experience last month. I had to pass "-bargs -E" through the command line because "-E" as a binder switch did not work. I also did not understand why, but I stopped thinking about it after I got it to work with -bargs.