From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a5834fbba6288f2a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-17 14:48:23 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Creating a DLL in Ada Date: 17 Jul 2002 16:48:20 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1026942104 30848 192.135.80.34 (17 Jul 2002 21:41:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27208 Date: 2002-07-17T16:48:20-06:00 List-Id: In article , "Daniel Dudley" writes: > "Pascal Obry" wrote in message > news:un0sqe73u.fsf@wanadoo.fr... >> My point was only that ACT can't be blamed for >> documentation badly built by volunteers :) > > A valid point, Pascal. However, ACT surely can be blamed > for the poor quality PS documentation, what? :-( Perhaps > it's a result of this wanting quality that forced the > creation of "unauthorized" PDF documentation. Authorize or unauthorized, the front page of the document should indicate the version of the software to which it applies. If the user goes looking for a more recent version of the documentation in hopes that DLLs will be supported by the new version of the software, it is all to their advantage, even if only the documentation was enhanced in this regard.