From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e188126e7f5e82f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Britt Snodgrass Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada not mentioned in GCC 4.3 release notes Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:03:52 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <9cd86244-11e5-45a1-b77b-1fb13e99b9ee@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <20080311093324.7c3a0447.tero.koskinen@iki.fi> NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.175.225.24 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1205247832 12667 127.0.0.1 (11 Mar 2008 15:03:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=205.175.225.24; posting-account=rdRzuwoAAAAyW3CSBhs_xgfCUJSc1aNt User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) ; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20295 Date: 2008-03-11T08:03:52-07:00 List-Id: On Mar 11, 4:28=A0am, Ludovic Brenta wrote: > AdaCore ship release notes and lists of known problems in each release > of GNAT Pro or GNAT GPL (look in ${prefix}/share/doc/gnat). > Unfortunately, they omit to synchronise these release notes with GCC's > announcement page. This reduces the visibility of Ada to the casual > user and reinforces the impression that Ada is a second-class citizen > in GCC. Too bad. > Yes, I agree that its looks bad. I've raised the issue on the gcc list before but nothing has happened. However, I have GNAT Pro 6.1.1 (the latest release) at work and it reports that it is using GCC 4.1.3, not 4.3, so maybe that's part of the explanation. - Britt