From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,dbbbb21ed7f581b X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: xorque Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Operation can be dispatching in only one type Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:41:14 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <025105f2-5571-400e-a66f-ef1c3dc9ef32@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <1wtsriaxu0s4s$.ikwnnz5teukp$.dlg@40tude.net> <1iipp3bn16fe2.yqa1gz1ru17a$.dlg@40tude.net> <18wh86jvjvoe0.cofxcc8udm6q$.dlg@40tude.net> <53a35ed9-88ac-43dc-b2a2-8d6880802328@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <4b091fb9$0$6567$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <1w0q3zxzw79pt$.5z0juiky7kfd$.dlg@40tude.net> <0f177771-381e-493b-92bb-28419dfbe4e6@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <1nbcfi99y0fkg.1h5ox2lj73okx$.dlg@40tude.net> <59acf311-3a4a-4eda-95a3-22272842305e@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.143.202.207 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1258915274 12923 127.0.0.1 (22 Nov 2009 18:41:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: g23g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=78.143.202.207; posting-account=D9GNUgoAAAAmg7CCIh9FhKHNAJmHypsp User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.13) Gecko/2009081019 Firefox/3.0.13,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8202 Date: 2009-11-22T10:41:14-08:00 List-Id: On Nov 22, 6:28=A0pm, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" wrote: > On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:03:22 -0800 (PST), xorque wrote: > > The problem semantically is that you convert type, which would/should > create a copy of a limited object... > > Ok, thanks for the explanation. I made the change you suggest to initialize ("save") the archive and the crash doesn't occur. I've closed the bug on the GCC due to the discussion of the bug becoming confused between two issues (one of them - this one - invalid and another that's definitely valid). Regards, xw