From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.107.39.84 with SMTP id n81mr5942665ion.130.1519337398861; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:09:58 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.157.14.214 with SMTP id 80mr392061otj.9.1519337398694; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:09:58 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!w142no468447ita.0!news-out.google.com!s63ni1336itb.0!nntp.google.com!w142no468442ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 14:09:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.99.9.146; posting-account=s89PEgoAAABHs2ETFyOrCeTQVQJAfzKq NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.99.9.146 References: <789f6417-5e6f-4d5f-8abb-80246f4f405a@googlegroups.com> <5e5ce844-42a8-c2de-bf53-4acf67be7f53@bahnhof.se> <2bf467d9-dbc1-46e9-981f-a092f82e7271@googlegroups.com> <8be2e00e-3331-4e04-8a33-ebcfb6041249@googlegroups.com> <2c8cc683-abf7-43e5-8022-dc3a5e63d34c@googlegroups.com> <2dd55386-2d47-48ad-bce8-4e5717af142f@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GNAT user-specified (via Raise_Exception) warning message size limit From: marciant@earthlink.net Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:09:58 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:50571 Date: 2018-02-22T14:09:58-08:00 List-Id: On Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 3:27:31 PM UTC-5, Simon Wright wrote: >... Thanks for the detailed instructions. However, having thought about how to do what you said, a detail that I had not realize was critical came to mind: The project actually depends on a precompiled library from another organization _that_we_can_not_recompiled_by_us_! So - probably obviously - the "adjust the runtime" "solution" almost definitely would not be a possible solution at all! :-( Right? Therefore, as of now, I think that the only possible solution is to adjust our code along the lines of the previous suggestions. Thank you all for effort and help. Vincent Marciante