From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,589fabad165a40d9 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.224.70.131 with SMTP id d3mr940575qaj.0.1348176257623; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.156.115 with SMTP id wd19mr648142vdb.2.1348176257594; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Path: t12ni1094712qak.0!nntp.google.com!l8no173333qao.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:24:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5d021b7c-705e-4795-9f4e-3f82dc2776ba@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=206.53.78.59; posting-account=ShYTIAoAAABytvcS76ZrG9GdaV-nXYKy NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.53.78.59 References: <505ad112$0$295$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <505ae3a6$0$289$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <5d021b7c-705e-4795-9f4e-3f82dc2776ba@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Tasking and timing out From: sbelmont700@gmail.com Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:24:17 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-09-20T14:24:17-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, September 20, 2012 2:33:46 PM UTC-4, Adam Beneschan wrote: > > (3) The Ada implementation provides facilities for abortable I/O > operations, and integrates this with its runtime so that an abort > will work properly. Of course, this means that > AWS.Net.Std.Connect would have to use those facilities, rather > than calling the OS operation directly. Also, a facility like > this would have to be written separately for each kind of I/O > operation. > Can you (or someone) elaborate on this? Do these currently exist in any fashion in an implementation, or are they standarized in any way by the LRM? Or is this purely hypothetical? My curiosity has been piqued. Thank you -sb