From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOTS_OF_MONEY, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,beb6b378a857b7ea X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-21 18:04:17 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!195.54.122.107!newsfeed1.bredband.com!bredband!news01.chello.se!newsfeed1.telenordia.se!algonet!uab.ericsson.se!news.sics.se!not-for-mail From: "Jimmy Dub�n" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Use of entries using Ravenscar Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 02:52:56 +0100 Organization: Swedish Institute of Computer Science Message-ID: References: <4948089f.0112180828.2ea4c80@posting.google.com> <4948089f.0112192354.5411f0ed@posting.google.com> <9vti1h$183d$1@not.sics.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: fatburen176.fatburen.org X-Trace: not.sics.se 1008985987 22440 194.236.216.176 (22 Dec 2001 01:53:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@not.sics.se NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Dec 2001 01:53:07 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18240 Date: 2001-12-22T01:53:07+00:00 List-Id: "martin.m.dowie" skrev i meddelandet news:Y0PU7.16177$4z5.1732281@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com... > "Jimmy Dub�n" wrote in message > news:9vti1h$183d$1@not.sics.se... > > > Task entries are forbidden but not PO entries but you're only allowed > > > one queued entry at a time... > > > > But this surely does only have one queued entry, right? > > One entry but my understanding of Ravenscar is that only > 1 task may be queued on this single entry at any one time, so > without the rest of your code, we can't make any judgement > on that. This is not a part of the code that is running in the system, it is just a small subset of the code that is similar to the real code, however it does not work! > > > > > The other thing I noticed was that nothing in the code actually > > > required this unit to be withed in at all. (true of a couple of other > > > with's and they certainly don't need to be withed in at the spec > > > level - with things at as low a level as possible). > > > > How can that affect the compiler errors? > > Well, I've never seen it with GNAT but I did come across another > compiler which would did have some strange ideas about what to > compile :-) That was a couple of years ago and there have definately > been new releases of that compiler, so I can say if these "features" > are still there! > > I presume you are using a Unix/Linux machine? On Win32 there is > a complaint about trying to attach the ISR but no sign of your original > problem, with or without the spurious "with"s. Sorry :-( > What? Am I understanding you correctly that you don'tget any compiler errors when you are compiling these files with pragma Ravenscar ???!