From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab46f8fd8bc30c31
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "patrick.gunia@googlemail.com" <patrick.gunia@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Problems with Scope of aliased Objects
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <a00d3613-2fe5-445d-83ab-2a67fe579386@b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <e9b734e0-478a-4849-b821-444cdbdfac2a@r33g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
	<605b4fb5-2be1-42c7-b8d6-11d0b6098a82@37g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>
	<7e8384b9-f3eb-473e-bf04-1207c6212799@v35g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.34.66.221
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1239898321 20730 127.0.0.1 (16 Apr 2009 16:12:01
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:12:01 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=78.34.66.221;
	posting-account=D7TrwwoAAAAVyN71CASRiSp392RIjlsB
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.64 (Windows NT 6.0; U;
 de) Presto/2.1.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5471
Date: 2009-04-16T09:12:01-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 16 Apr., 18:01, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 8:50 am, Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Patrick,
>
> > Why don't you pass the outer array as an "in out" parameter to your
> > subprogram and let the subprogram write directly into the array?
>
> I get the impression that the OP wanted an array of class-wide types,
> so this won't work.
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -- Adam

Yes, this is exactly what I need. I=B4d like to use the elements of the
array for polymorphic methods and the array has to be able to keep
members from different classes within my hierarchie. Thus I won=B4t have
another option then declaring the array as an array of class-wide
access types. So this part is fixed. In Ludovic=B4s approach I would
still work with concrete instances of my class, which won=B4t work for
my structure.