From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,534fa4a9760d2415 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-09-01 04:58:51 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!news-out1.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling!news-in-sterling.nuthinbutnews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny03.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Stephane Richard" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: Subject: Re: Welcome to Ada World! X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: <_vG4b.711$Qk4.685@nwrdny03.gnilink.net> Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 11:58:50 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.44.79.117 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrdny03.gnilink.net 1062417530 129.44.79.117 (Mon, 01 Sep 2003 07:58:50 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 07:58:50 EDT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:42032 Date: 2003-09-01T11:58:50+00:00 List-Id: I just did a few more searches and seems there's more than one WIKI engines...I'm thinking of pmWIKI. To those that know WIKI, is this worth the installation? :-). or is there a more recommended WIKI Engine? -- St�phane Richard Senior Software and Technology Supervisor http://www.totalweb-inc.com For all your hosting and related needs "Georg Bauhaus" wrote in message news:bivc64$dkn$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de... > Stephane Richard wrote: > : Well I was thinking about WIKI's but for the development projects > : themselves....such as a wiki to keep people informed on the development > : progress of a given project. > > We have found a WiKi as a useful compromise for assembling > project-related information, iff people are disciplined. > For example, it has information that is not found in source code > comments or doesn't seem to belong there, like descriptions of > installation procedures, > when there is no official document or when there are quickly moving > targets or when the project is very small. > > In addition, it allows one to add explanations of how the > whole program works, in an ad hoc fashion. > > > Georg