From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5ee499d03212eed3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-08 17:25:31 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!enews.sgi.com!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Dynamic dispatch again References: <3BC1F97E.6EA2F1E7@san.rr.com> X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: <_trw7.16605$IY3.11751097@news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com> Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 00:25:30 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.7.82.199 X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news1.rdc1.sfba.home.com 1002587130 24.7.82.199 (Mon, 08 Oct 2001 17:25:30 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 17:25:30 PDT Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13975 Date: 2001-10-09T00:25:30+00:00 List-Id: >Right now, my alternative is ... . Ugly. I've *always* found that if something was ugly/difficult in Ada, after some thought it would become clear that the approach was in fact a poor one, and a different approach, which worked nicely in Ada, was a better one. (Not to say that this alternative nice approach in this case is obvious. ;)