From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,81cf52699486abe7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com
Subject: Re: Code size of Ada ? was Re: Ada95 Strengths/Weaknesses.
Date: 1999/09/29
Message-ID: <_pwI3.244$VN3.12445@typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 530893901
References: <1103_938628432@DZOG-CHEN>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net
X-Trace: typhoon-sf.snfc21.pbi.net 938644218 206.170.2.119 (Wed,
 29 Sep 1999 15:30:18 PDT)
Organization: SBC Internet Services
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 15:30:18 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-09-29T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>On windows, both the Microsoft linker and the Phar Lap linker we
>use for embedded applications are smart enough to eliminate
>unreferenced code sections, for Ada or for other languages.
  Including tagged type primitive operations that will never
be called?