From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,28a755ada641b984
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s03.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Jeff C," <jcreem@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: 
 <%7XQc.100722$eM2.38916@attbi_s51><lm5Rc.218065$a24.134231@attbi_s03>
 <mailman.6.1091897074.414.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <C4WdnYJjvPMFNrbcRVn-ow@megapath.net>
Subject: Re: Longstanding GNAT bug, bad code, or both -- Answer..Bad code.
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Message-ID: <_i_Wc.306615$a24.111669@attbi_s03>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.147.74.171
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-Trace: attbi_s03 1093431610 24.147.74.171 (Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:00:10 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:00:10 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:00:10 GMT
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2988
Date: 2004-08-25T11:00:10+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> wrote in message 
news:C4WdnYJjvPMFNrbcRVn-ow@megapath.net...
> This is old, but some enlightenment is provided...
>
> "Stephen Leake" <stephen_leake@acm.org> wrote in message
> news:mailman.6.1091897074.414.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org...
>> "Jeff C," <jcreem@yahoo.com> writes:
>> > Ok. I submitted a bugzilla report and it has already been
>> > cancelled.  Apparently, declaring a variable as aliased makes it
>> > contrained.  (According to one of the gcc Ada maintainers)
>
> One would think that the attempt to modify the object inside the procedure
> would cause Constraint_Error to be raised. Or was this non-Ada code?
>

Thanks for the clarification! (In the part I deleted).. And yes it was 
modified in Non-Ada code.