From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,38159b1b5557a2e7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-19 15:03:45 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed-west.nntpserver.com!hub1.meganetnews.com!nntpserver.com!newshosting.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!216.196.98.140.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!border1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.sjc.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:03:39 -0600 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:03:38 -0500 From: "Robert I. Eachus" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: why ada is so unpopular ? References: <49cbf610.0401170627.79c3dfe5@posting.google.com> <400A9B48.3060100@noplace.com> <400BD4B5.6000307@noplace.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <_NedndNu6J_W_5Hd4p2dnA@comcast.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.34.214.193 X-Trace: sv3-Zf8xZ8dyh3j9vMdjoMRXiKkFVmbjJEYa4kMXV9OPYL0+JQ+tJX5lkeiTidl5rZhkWsW6gxxLYztOA6n!bU1d27ZEQ0eOF22rYicksEM4bdzufVAj7xRUtvODsI4jFaG0uyjKgP6891fbCg== X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4558 Date: 2004-01-19T18:03:38-05:00 List-Id: Jeff C, wrote: > So the GMGPL is actually a slightly lesser (in RMS speak) language than the > LGPL (meaning that it does not require the "field upgrade" capability of the LGPL. I am not picking on Jeff, who does a good job of describing why GTK+ uses LGPL and GtkAda uses GMGPL. I just want to say that the consensus is that GtkAda can be used without any "Gnu contamination" of your application. You can release such a program as proprietary or if you prefer copylefted or into the public domain. All you really need to know is that the respective developers got their licensing right so that you don't need to worry. As to GtkAda, it seems to be the consensus Ada graphics library right now. It would be nice if someone would update it, but probably the best way to describe the situation is that it is much better than "good enough" so no one currently seems to feel a need to do better. -- Robert I. Eachus "The war on terror is a different kind of war, waged capture by capture, cell by cell, and victory by victory. Our security is assured by our perseverance and by our sure belief in the success of liberty." -- George W. Bush