From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,43b8954d461d7206
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-26 20:59:38 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc04.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Gnat error msg meaning?
References: <bbegua.m94.ln@beastie.ix.netcom.com>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <_6RO9.127846$qF3.10115@sccrnsc04>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: sccrnsc04 1040965178 12.234.13.56 (Fri, 27 Dec 2002 04:59:38 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 04:59:38 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 04:59:38 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32327
Date: 2002-12-27T04:59:38+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> the language is requiring you to specify actual values
> for the discriminants (Max_Strings, Max_Characters, Task_Safe)
  I don't think so.  I give them actual values when declaring an object
of that type.
  I'm thinking now it might be a Gnat bug since two other compilers seem
to have no complaints.  Anybody seen anything similar?