From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,13b7917466f2d19 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-02 13:22:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!supernews.com!telocity-west!TELOCITY!nntpserver.com!hub1.nntpserver.com!news-out.spamkiller.net!propagator-la!news-in-la.newsfeeds.com!news-in.superfeed.net!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: <9a575af3.0110020747.2304ce86@posting.google.com> <9pd0j8$7pu1@news.cis.okstate.edu> Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC 3.0 Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 16:22:17 EDT Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 20:22:17 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13648 Date: 2001-10-02T20:22:17+00:00 List-Id: In article <9pd0j8$7pu1@news.cis.okstate.edu>, David Starner says... > >On 2 Oct 2001 08:47:11 -0700, G. Fisher wrote: >> Does anyone know when a version (public or commercial) of GNAT that is >> compatable with GCC 3.0 will be available? I'm told that this has >The way I understand it, never. The first GNAT based off of GCC 3.x will >be based off GCC 3.1, which they are approaching the freeze date on. According to what I read, the freeze date is tonight. So no-one bother Richard Kenner and the ACT folks until they get the rest of those "kinks" straightened out, OK? :-) --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.