From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a5834fbba6288f2a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-07-17 06:20:57 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.213.112.26!newsfeed1.ulv.nextra.no!nextra.com!news4.ulv.nextra.no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Daniel Dudley" <dudley@online.no>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <ho0Z8.6145$HR.85630@news4.ulv.nextra.no>
 <mailman.1026878522.27555.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <FQ7Z8.6125$eY6.118853@news2.ulv.nextra.no> <usn2iep6h.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Creating a DLL in Ada
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID: <ZaeZ8.3$sR2.194@news4.ulv.nextra.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 130.67.192.161
X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@nextra.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 15:20:57 MEST
X-Trace: news4.ulv.nextra.no 1026912057 130.67.192.161
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:20:57 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27186
Date: 2002-07-17T13:20:57+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Pascal Obry" <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
news:usn2iep6h.fsf@wanadoo.fr...
>
> "Daniel Dudley" <dudley@online.no> writes:
>
> > Actually, it is to be found in the HTML version of the User
> > Guide but not in the PDF version, which I have been using
>
> The HTML version is provided with GNAT 3.14p but not the PDF one.
> This has certainly been built by somebody else than ACT and
> the PDF you have is not for the Windows platform !

Perhaps ACT ought to produce an authorized PDF version,
Pascal? I'm sure there are many users like me who are wary
of the potential damage to their eyesight with prolonged
reading of text online. Besides, hardcopies are far more
suitable for getting the "overall picture".

Daniel