From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,682c6a4dc0495d48 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!wn13feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: anon@anon.org (anon) Subject: Re: Yes it is possible. Re: Stackusage at runtime Reply-To: no to spamers (No@email.given.org) References: <058e7ef3-2160-4134-9657-62ac194e6e45@s9g2000prm.googlegroups.com> X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:00:41 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.64.24.150 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1225947641 12.64.24.150 (Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:00:41 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:00:41 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2593 Date: 2008-11-06T05:00:41+00:00 List-Id: There was no confusion except your a fake that thinks he knows Ada. I am not sure how you became Debian Ada maintainer. And that was the saddest day in Debian history! In <058e7ef3-2160-4134-9657-62ac194e6e45@s9g2000prm.googlegroups.com>, Ludovic Brenta writes: >anon wrote: >> But Ludovic Brenta is quick at doing nothing but cutting people down! > >Oh I don't have to cut you down. You do that yourself very well. >However, someone had to clear up the confusion you created by mixing >up stack and heap. Someone might have read your answer and been >misled. > >> Even if Brenta does not understand, > >I do understand. Your answer was wrong because you did not understand >the OP's question. Do you understand *that* now? > >> also I see Ludovic Brenta had no answer to give. > >I had not only one but two answers to give. Niklas Holsti and Stuart, >respectively, gave them before I did, so I did not repeat them. See? I >actually read threads before I reply. Apparently you fail to >understand *that*, too. > >> So Ludovic Brenta should get back and fix Annex -E for Debian and let >> people help those who need it. > >Ludovic Brenta should *nothing*; you seem to fail to understand >*that*, too. If you need Annex E for Debian, fix it yourself. > >-- >Ludovic Brenta.