From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2ca464c92c72e0e9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: tmoran@bix.com Subject: Re: Ada grammar Date: 2000/05/05 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 619716514 References: <07a73f60.478cecce@usw-ex0102-015.remarq.com> X-Complaints-To: abuse@pacbell.net X-Trace: news.pacbell.net 957556985 206.170.2.135 (Fri, 05 May 2000 13:03:05 PDT) Organization: SBC Internet Services NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 13:03:05 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 2000-05-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: There was "A YACC grammar for Ada 9X" posted at Intermetrics. I have a version usable with ayacc (reserved word tokens changed to not be reserved words themselves) which I can send. But look at www.adapower.com where there is mention of an ayacc/aflex customized for Gnat - perhaps that has an Ada 95 grammar. I also have a version of the UCI ayacc/aflex modified from Ada 83 to Ada 95 if the Gnat version won't work.