From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1e4bb63e08046e1a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-10-24 13:45:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.mathworks.com!cyclone.swbell.net!bos-service1.ext.raytheon.com!dfw-service2.ext.raytheon.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Wes Groleau User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 X-Accept-Language: en,es-MX,es,pt,fr-CA,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: is exception when others => null; smart? References: <3DB8204B.2080804@attbi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:23:21 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.168.133.155 X-Complaints-To: news@ext.ray.com X-Trace: dfw-service2.ext.raytheon.com 1035491001 151.168.133.155 (Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:23:21 CDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:23:21 CDT Organization: Raytheon Company Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30113 Date: 2002-10-24T15:23:21-05:00 List-Id: > It seems to me that editors that automatically generate procedure body > templates should *not* insert exception handlers. It's not helpful -- > 99% of the time, the user will have to delete the thing. And I would recommend auto-insert: --[ exception --[ when others => raise; This makes you think about it, and then it's easy to auto-strip any you chose not to modify.