From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,c4cb2c432feebd9d X-Google-Thread: 101deb,15c6ed4b761968e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid1094ba,gid101deb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!ken-transit.news.telstra.net!lon-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "robin" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.pl1 References: <0ugu4e.4i7.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> <%P_cg.155733$eR6.26337@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> <6H9dg.10258$S7.9150@news-server.bigpond.net.au> <1hfv5wb.1x4ab1tbdzk7eN%nospam@see.signature> <2006052509454116807-gsande@worldnetattnet> <5rSdnTfTP7NHEyzZnZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d@comcast.com> <4vXsg.3182$tE5.2948@news-server.bigpond.net.au> Subject: Re: Ada vs Fortran for scientific applications X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 01:48:41 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.54.177.147 X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1153187321 203.54.177.147 (Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:48:41 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:48:41 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5748 comp.lang.fortran:12131 comp.lang.pl1:2020 Date: 2006-07-18T01:48:41+00:00 List-Id: glen herrmannsfeldt wrote in message ... >robin wrote: > >> glen herrmannsfeldt wrote in message ... > >(snip) >>>CDC used ones complement, > >> Yes, and they were a PITA. >> But they are long-gone machines, as I said; some 20 + years. > >>>and as I understand it Univac still does. > >No comment on this one? I don't know which compilers are >available for it, but it does seem to still be in production. > >(snip) > >>>S/360 and successors use sign magnitude for fixed point decimal >>>arithmetic. > >> Off topic. We're referring to binary integers, not decimal > >Why is it off topic? For the reason that i said, viz, we're refering to binary integers. >Fortran allows any base greater than one. Let me know if you find a compiler that uses a base other than 2 for binary integers. >PL/I definitely allows decimal, Not for binary integers. > most likely even for FIXED BINARY variables. Might have some trouble doing indexing and logical operations.