From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,db9a11afb3da4240 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-30 05:47:40 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!supernews.com!newspump.sol.net!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!enews.sgi.com!news-out.spamkiller.net!propagator-la!news-in-la.newsfeeds.com!newsfeed.onecall.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Language support for flexible handling of system-detected errors. Date: 30 Mar 2002 07:46:54 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1017496058 11344 192.135.80.34 (30 Mar 2002 13:47:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 13:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21888 Date: 2002-03-30T07:46:54-06:00 List-Id: In article , "Marin David Condic" writes: > O.K. So what *would* you like? :-) > > I've used both and while I can see negatives, they *do* provide some > interesting capabilities. You can't please everybody, but there's probably > some common body of features that most of us would consider desirable in an > IDE. I would _like_ to think there was such a set to draw a constituency, but I have no factual basis for believing such a set of features can be listed.