From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,feeba31d5415227b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!4988f22a!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <43EC6B05.90807@obry.net> Subject: Re: Crosstalk Article from Aonix X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.134.138.49 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr11.news.prodigy.com 1139626744 ST000 70.134.138.49 (Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:59:04 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:59:04 EST Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com X-UserInfo1: Q[R_PJONTBWQR]TX\ZIBNFXBWR\HPCTL@XT^OBPLAH[\BTUCCNSKQFCY@TXDX_WHSVB]ZEJLSNY\^J[CUVSA_QLFC^RQHUPH[P[NRWCCMLSNPOD_ESALHUK@TDFUZHBLJ\XGKL^NXA\EVHSP[D_C^B_^JCX^W]CHBAX]POG@SSAZQ\LE[DCNMUPG_VSC@VJM Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 02:59:04 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2851 Date: 2006-02-11T02:59:04+00:00 List-Id: "jean-Pierre FAUCHE" wrote in message news:dsi1vl$5pj$1@s1.news.oleane.net... > > > Aonix is not going away from Ada! >From the article written by someone from Aonix, this is not apparent. More damaging is that the absence of any mention of Ada, from a company that was founded on Ada technology, gives the false impression that Aonix is no longer interested in Ada. That impression contributes to the decline of Ada. It is a kind of self-fulfilling prophecy. This is truly sad since Aonix was once an advocate for Ada and now seems to be saying, "We are de-emphasizing Ada in favor of an inferior technology, Real-time Java." Everything the author thinks will make Java better is already present in Ada. Why is there no mention of that fact? There was a time when I was happy to see Aonix taking a stand for what was right. I see the image a bit tarnished by this article. Richard Riehle