From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,be23df8e7e275d73
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-26 08:07:37 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!opentransit.net!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!proxad.net!feeder2-1.proxad.net!nnrp5.proxad.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "nicolas" <n.brunot@cadwin.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <mailman.995648003.8404.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <%cR67.1385$mz6.4505748@nnrp3.proxad.net>
 <9jgopl$5v6$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net>
 <lpS67.1427$OA6.4515044@nnrp3.proxad.net>
 <9jh2cs$aon$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net>
 <2sU67.1485$di7.4670499@nnrp3.proxad.net>
 <9jhb8u$g3s$1@s1.read.news.oleane.net> <3B5C4A92.647FC2EC@earthlink.net>
 <2bb77.5186$DL4.5097616@nnrp5.proxad.net> <3B5D5B79.F2DC527E@earthlink.net>
 <Zse77.5300$v_4.5185683@nnrp5.proxad.net>
 <9jp5dc$e2b$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Subject: Re: Java portability
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Message-ID: <YmW77.763$th7.2260036@nnrp5.proxad.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 15:07:36 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.101.131.241
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
X-Trace: nnrp5.proxad.net 996160056 195.101.131.241 (Thu,
 26 Jul 2001 17:07:36 CEST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 17:07:36 CEST
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10598
Date: 2001-07-26T15:07:36+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Georg Bauhaus" <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> a �crit dans le message
news: 9jp5dc$e2b$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de...
> Well, what can you do? Does your company do some lobbying
> to get this standardized?
> Besides, methinks we all should be using DWIM :-)
>
What else can we do ? the answer is easy.
Compare available options and choose the best one
If there is a good way to access Java through Ada, which doesn't make you
dependant of just one vendor, why not ?
If it's easier to write in Java directly, why spending time in useless
lobbying and complicated or not portable interfaces ?