From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5ddcf55fabcfa088
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:35:58 -0500
From: Martyn Pike <joe@somewhere.org>
Subject: Re: Issues with GPS on Xubuntu
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <4qSdnUDSdZ7C0BTRnZ2dnUVZ7rydnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<6ce518ad-74e7-4d81-91a8-3f6a36de7ef1@u13g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
	<h_ednepBhpHKqRfRnZ2dnUVZ8oydnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<8739thbe7s.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
	<8sGdnUjT5fN5ExfRnZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<87r5h19r47.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <YcidnTkGDMLTvhbRnZ2dnUVZ7omdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 01:35:58 -0500
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: 
 sv3-p0TnPYfcFrgiud+lbWAi8I4gs7S0u0mJ8YsgszEp3VWPJWpcJyHfvPqZuF1rU9Ef5HEWYb+KTwXB7Jo!ZAGSu+mibmcqTGCYkGp33/aVTkl0Vn0tGUDAu0G650Dx8UJyYepfC/rkOn2hcLHaY4FlQeKJuUw=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14005
Date: 2010-09-11T01:35:58-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 00:21:44 +0200, Ludovic Brenta wrote:

> IIUC, the Ada page should be full of check boxes and other nifty
> widgets, right?
> 

Yes that is correct.

> 
> This seems like a bug in the gnat-gps package that should not be present
> in the GNAT GPL 2010 binary distribution.  Was that what you meant?
>

Yes that is what I meant.

> 
> Anyway I've filed a bug report and will try to find the time to correct
> that.  See http://bugs.debian.org/596385

Thanks Ludovic.