From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e8023133274ae02c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.28.186.75.MISMATCH!hwmnpeer01.lga!hwmedia!news.highwinds-media.com!hw-filter.phx!fe12.lga.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "bh" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <1146039364.130635.181590@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: procedural vs object oriented X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4947.1900 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4952.2800 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 21:33:04 -0400 NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.44.53.129 X-Complaints-To: abuse@cv.net X-Trace: fe12.lga 1146101560 24.44.53.129 (Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:32:40 MST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 18:32:40 MST Organization: Optimum Online Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:3940 Date: 2006-04-26T21:33:04-04:00 List-Id: "Ananth the Boss" wrote in message news:1146039364.130635.181590@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com... > i am working in Ada based flight software development project.as a > means of improving i took to the CASE tool based development.ours is a > procedural approach of development.but the commercial CASE tools speak > a lot about class/object/UML.how will this suit for procedure oriented > development where we dont have necessity to identify classes and do > detailed design as mentioned in OO aproach > If you don't _know_ how to do good OO with Ada, I'd recommend against it. We tried a project using OO and I think it is pretty safe to say we didn't get what we were hoping for. I think your results will be better with procedural.