From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a00006d3c4735d70 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-10 19:12:57 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!elnk-pas-nf1!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!attbi_s53.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Certified C compilers for safety-critical embedded systems References: X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.161.24.134 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-Trace: attbi_s53 1073790776 67.161.24.134 (Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:12:56 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:12:56 GMT Organization: Comcast Online Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:12:56 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4322 Date: 2004-01-11T03:12:56+00:00 List-Id: > It's always been my contention that writing the specifications which you > will then prove that a program obeys is exactly as hard as writing the > program itself. Specification: the program will print, on January 30, 2004, the name of the President of the United States on January 30, 2005. That wasn't a hard spec to write - I await your implementation. ;)