From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f822ae7b0f7433c1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s71.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060130 SeaMonkey/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Translating an embedded C algorithm References: <1168871816.263502.212100@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.201.97.213 X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com X-Trace: attbi_s71 1168968760 12.201.97.213 (Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:32:40 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:32:40 GMT Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:32:44 GMT Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8186 Date: 2007-01-16T17:32:44+00:00 List-Id: Cesar Rabak wrote: > > And why cannot C be augmented by RTOSs and other systems software to > achieve this? It can. You can also write everything in assembler. Both are very error prone. Neither is very portable. > Instead of taking profit of an opportunity you rather just spit a bit of > arrogance? Let's see ... It's not arrogant to write a book on RT embedded SW development when one is ignorant of basic tools for the task, but it is arrogant to point it out? Thanks for pointing that out to me.