From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e9162c7148e2126 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-15 13:04:08 PST Path: archiver1.sj.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.mindspring.net!newspump.sol.net!homer.alpha.net!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: Subject: Re: UD(datagram) multicasting in ada X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3719.2500 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 15:02:52 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 156.46.62.124 X-Complaints-To: abuse@alpha.net X-Trace: homer.alpha.net 989957048 156.46.62.124 (Tue, 15 May 2001 15:04:08 CDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 15:04:08 CDT Xref: archiver1.sj.google.com comp.lang.ada:7536 Date: 2001-05-15T15:02:52-05:00 List-Id: Coker, Jeremy wrote in message ... >Hi, can anyone help me. > >I've been using the R.R. Claw package to do UDP datagram send/receive, > >The claw package does not seem to include multicasting for UDP (is this >correct ?) > >Otherwise, does anyone have any hints/example of UDP multicasting in ADA ? Claw.Sockets was implemented on top of WinSock 1.1. Multicasting was introduced with WinSock 2.0, so we didn't look at implementing it. We could probably look at implementing a multicasting package; is your Claw support agreement up-to-date?? Randy Brukardt R.R. Software, Inc.