From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,38159b1b5557a2e7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-18 05:25:12 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!199.45.49.37!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny03.gnilink.net.POSTED!da342007!not-for-mail From: "Stephane Richard" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <49cbf610.0401170627.79c3dfe5@posting.google.com> Subject: Re: why ada is so unpopular ? X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:25:12 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.149.82.37 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrdny03.gnilink.net 1074432312 141.149.82.37 (Sun, 18 Jan 2004 08:25:12 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 08:25:12 EST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4528 Date: 2004-01-18T13:25:12+00:00 List-Id: To what I know too, there's no Ada binding for it....and it would probably be equal or less work to port the whole library to Ada instead of attempting to bind to it. -- St�phane Richard "Ada World" Webmaster http://www.adaworld.com "Ronald Dauster" wrote in message news:budvvf$9al$1@online.de... > Szymon Guz wrote: > > > > > well.. I know that, but my problem is a little bit different. I don't > > have money for sth like Builder or Kylix or Visual but I think that my > > program really needs to operate on some windows. I don't want to write > > that using WinApi nor Gtk; First of all the Gtk/Qt licence is not good > > The Gtk and Qt licenses are substantially different. GTK is under > LGPL and I do not see, where this creates a problem. Qt, of course, > either requires your application to be licensed under GPL or you have > to buy a commercial license. > > > for me and WinApi is terrible. I wanted to use wxWindows. It is written > > in C++, that's why I still don't know what to choose. Mix wxWindows(C++) > > with Ada or just use C++. > > As far as I know, there is no Ada binding to wxWindows and, given the > size and programming style of wxWindows, it will be a _lot_ of work to > create one. > > >