To what I know too, there's no Ada binding for it....and it would probably
be equal or less work to port the whole library to Ada instead of attempting
to bind to it.

-- 
St�phane Richard
"Ada World" Webmaster
http://www.adaworld.com


"Ronald Dauster" <rpd@gido.remove_this_part.de> wrote in message
news:budvvf$9al$1@online.de...
> Szymon Guz wrote:
>
> >
> > well.. I know that, but my problem is a little bit different. I don't
> > have money for sth like Builder or Kylix or Visual but I think that my
> > program really needs to operate on some windows. I don't want to write
> > that using WinApi nor Gtk; First of all the Gtk/Qt licence is not good
>
> The Gtk and Qt licenses are substantially different. GTK is under
> LGPL and I do not see, where this creates a problem. Qt, of course,
> either requires your application to be licensed under GPL or you have
> to buy a commercial license.
>
> > for me and WinApi is terrible. I wanted to use wxWindows. It is written
> > in C++, that's why I still don't know what to choose. Mix wxWindows(C++)
> > with Ada or just use C++.
>
> As far as I know, there is no Ada binding to wxWindows and, given the
> size and programming style of wxWindows, it will be a _lot_ of work to
> create one.
>
>
>