From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1d52a75fd633fefc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-11 05:15:43 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!128.230.129.106!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!sjc-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!iad-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada to C++ translator? Message-ID: References: <3A844255.24A4DBA3@lmco.com> <3A866B28.CE67B4A0@yyy.zzz> Organization: LJK Software Date: 11 Feb 2001 08:15:39 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.44.122.34 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net X-Trace: iad-read.news.verio.net 981897341 216.44.122.34 (Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:15:41 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 13:15:41 GMT Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5116 Date: 2001-02-11T08:15:39-05:00 List-Id: In article <3A866B28.CE67B4A0@yyy.zzz>, Gautier writes: > Robert Brantley: > >> Any recommendations on a Ada to C++ translator? We have no Ada tasking >> constructs to deal with. > > Strange... Do you feel you are obliged to use > the Ada tasking just because this is available ?! I presumed he meant that automated translation of software that did not use Ada tasking would be easier than doing so for software that did use Ada tasking. ============================================================================== Great Inventors of our time: Al Gore -> Internet; Sun Microsystems -> Clusters ==============================================================================