From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8c3785c280bb1e80
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:14:51 -0500
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <MrNoSpam-87B025.22553122062004@news-server.bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: New reserved words?
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:15:15 -0500
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
Message-ID: <Y82dnZ-OYOo2S0TdRVn-vw@megapath.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38
X-Trace: 
 sv3-ejAnOO46Xo4wjXx2wmKOLyHZhXI7tQ0dayvxqL5RlXJpeCmAD5WJcqp6Du1DKhfHmX5Bth7c4fzkFVt!GF57+LabyIMaYjRDOKA6jkoRKTRW9k8geOZ4CbMfMyNHOLguQ1+O/jGuOlh4QmYvvMdB+6rYcF4+
X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1818
Date: 2004-06-23T14:15:15-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dale Stanbrough" <MrNoSpam@bigpoop.net.au> wrote in message
news:MrNoSpam-87B025.22553122062004@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Is there any agreement on likely new reserved words for
> Ada0Y?

At this point (after the Palma de Mallorca meeting), there is likely to be
three added keywords:

    interface (AI-251)
    overriding (AI-218-3)
    synchronized (AI-345)

Whether these will be new reserved words, or whether we'll define
"unreserved keywords" is still undecided.

[Note that the last one was added very recently; it is a modifier for
interfaces, and it declares that an interfaces can only be implemented by a
task or protected type. There are also 'task' and 'protected' interfaces,
with the obvious semantics. We also approved making 'limited' interfaces
universal, in that they can be implemented by tagged, limited tagged, task,
and protected types -- pretty much everything that makes sense.]

                          Randy.