"Jimmy Dub�n" <duben@fatburen.org> wrote in message
news:9vti1h$183d$1@not.sics.se...
> > Task entries are forbidden but not PO entries but you're only allowed
> > one queued entry at a time...
>
> But this surely does only have one queued entry, right?

One entry but my understanding of Ravenscar is that only
1 task may be queued on this single entry at any one time, so
without the rest of your code, we can't make any judgement
on that.


> > The other thing I noticed was that nothing in the code actually
> > required this unit to be withed in at all. (true of a couple of other
> > with's and they certainly don't need to be withed in at the spec
> > level - with things at as low a level as possible).
>
> How can that affect the compiler errors?

Well, I've never seen it with GNAT but I did come across another
compiler which would did have some strange ideas about what to
compile :-) That was a couple of years ago and there have definately
been new releases of that compiler, so I can say if these "features"
are still there!

I presume you are using a Unix/Linux machine? On Win32 there is
a complaint about trying to attach the ISR but no sign of your original
problem, with or without the spurious "with"s. Sorry :-(