From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1fa85f3df5841ae1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net.POSTED!a6202946!not-for-mail
From: Jeffrey Carter <spam@spam.com>
Organization: jrcarter commercial-at acm [period | full stop] org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.Containers.Vectors - querying multiple elements
References: <mailman.76.1114515863.24457.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <426e4c2b$0$7515$9b4e6d93@newsread2.arcor-online.net>
 <R_Ebe.13911$lP1.2554@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <jNOdnZ_Vi8Bcs-3fRVn-jA@megapath.net>
 <0uYbe.542$BE3.229@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <zq-dndHiJ-a_0OzfRVn-iA@megapath.net>
 <hlhce.936$HL2.780@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <x6qdnf60tbYtDO_fRVn-ig@megapath.net>
In-Reply-To: <x6qdnf60tbYtDO_fRVn-ig@megapath.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <XuDce.2061$HL2.729@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 04:06:15 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.3.219.142
X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net
X-Trace: newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net 1114833975 67.3.219.142 (Fri,
 29 Apr 2005 21:06:15 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 21:06:15 PDT
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10846
Date: 2005-04-30T04:06:15+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Randy Brukardt wrote:

> I have no idea what you are talking about. That would represent an array
> with exactly one default initialized element -- if it was allowed, which it
> is not. That's because "<>" is only allowed with named notation, meaning you
> have to give the bounds in the aggregate (or use "others").

Apparently, neither do I. That's what I get for relying on my memory. I 
seem to recall something to allow declaration of a null aggregate for 
any array type, but I've now spent some time searching the AIs and can't 
find it. Sorry.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam! Spam!"
Monty Python's Flying Circus
53