From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,23dabf88feae3dba
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!bcklog1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:54:08 -0500
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <4fssh9F1ena5jU1@individual.net>
 <8KOdnYaLZJaLMATZnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@megapath.net>
 <87odwmcdku.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net>
 <Coqdne6sVImxvwbZnZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@megapath.net>
 <87wtb7btnc.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net>
Subject: Re: Elaboration worries
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 14:54:52 -0500
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
Message-ID: <XrKdnWHf49p92wHZnZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@megapath.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38
X-Trace: 
 sv3-KciNI299vlGnPhZjC7POC/KLT70rrLsKfKtxhqrJbTGm68SooRBKIUt4ipgwUl2ATBJSFoYKzgpS4XA!osGZFcRXde7qd1PjXe01veMkzWhjhsrT7HQPayGA9ksqVp+9CyL55PsVgpDmb7bNKbjBu/xL1e+B!ZvCaDiJTq816Sg==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4940
Date: 2006-06-23T14:54:52-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Samuel Tardieu" <sam@rfc1149.net> wrote in message
news:87wtb7btnc.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net...
> >>>>> "Randy" == Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:
>
> Randy> OTOH, I was under the impression that most Ravenscar programs
> Randy> used what is now known as the "Concurrent" elaboration policy
> Randy> (see H.6 in the Ada 2005 RM). That prevents tasks from being
> Randy> started until elaboration of library units is finished.
>
> You mean "Sequential" rather than "Concurrent"?

Yes, of course. Sorry for any confusion.

                    Randy.