From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM,PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,36a29c2860aff686 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!85.214.198.2.MISMATCH!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Warren Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Properties Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <3b84c8e7-1a51-4a7c-9646-119f1fc51478@s4g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <4pnv7nl4cdui$.1n28i7lqk4mek$.dlg@40tude.net> <1k7367gtebsgm$.18auo6u3nfg34.dlg@40tude.net> <618677c8-a44f-443e-9052-a94fb48c999a@s4g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <4287748c-0962-4cd2-a36b-9dd7113267a6@21g2000prv.googlegroups.com> Injection-Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx03.eternal-september.org; posting-host="9f8M0iN5t54V+4DF/iqO8g"; logging-data="27371"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+4r6LxvCbVkNrfOvs22+8Rmd9aav1ZnNc=" User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25 X-Face: &6@]C2>ZS=NM|HE-^zWuryN#Z/2_.s9E|G&~DRi|sav9{E}XQJb*\_>=a5"q]\%A;5}LKP][1mA{gZ,Q!j Cancel-Lock: sha1:uy0YaPSWXOm0ONKeVyNVQOeNuyI= Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:16723 Date: 2010-12-02T20:38:19+00:00 List-Id: Adam Beneschan expounded in news:4287748c-0962-4cd2-a36b-9dd7113267a6@21g2000prv.googlegro ups.com: > On Dec 2, 8:45�am, Warren wrote: >> Shark8 expounded >> But then, prior to Unix, O/S's were usually steeped in >> assembler language (like OS/2 for a modern example). �C >> has been a big improvement in that regard. > > Yes, the big disadvantage that assembler had over C was > that, despite the fact that its mnemonics can be cryptic, > they are actually based on English words and use real > letters, which meant that there was a real possibility that > the rookie programmer in the next cubicle might actually be > able to understand and fix your program, leading to loss > of job security. I think that was one of the problems C > was designed to address. > >:) :) :) Just kidding! > > -- Adam Joking aside, C allowed the compiler to work on behalf of a programmer's higher level intentions, without making assembler level errors. Ada could be said that it allows the [Ada] compiler to work on behalf of the programmer's higher level intentions, without making C level errors. Warren