From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a92e43963a6b930f
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Warren <ve3wwg@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: N best things about Ada?
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:34:13 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <Xns9DB48A0AFD81DWarrensBlatherings@81.169.183.62>
References: 
 <97691fd2-7411-4ccc-bc7b-290aca633cd5@z30g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
 <Xns9DB47D44B90E7WarrensBlatherings@85.214.73.210>
 <4c3ca07c$0$6889$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Injection-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:34:13 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx01.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="9f8M0iN5t54V+4DF/iqO8g";
	logging-data="22554"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ywiKz5lJZisxN14HGZPYZGkhPtAF9FGg="
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-Face: 
 &6@]C2>ZS=NM|HE-^zWuryN#Z/2_.s9E|G&~DRi|sav9{E}XQJb*\_>=a5"q]\%A;5}LKP][1mA{gZ,Q!j
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kOi3DefP0IFK6Bp0Ibv+9OENGis=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12388
Date: 2010-07-13T17:34:13+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Georg Bauhaus expounded in news:4c3ca07c$0$6889$9b4e6d93
@newsspool2.arcor-online.net:

> On 13.07.10 18:18, Warren wrote:
> 
>> There is nothing better than early bug detection!
> 
> Indeed!  Finding type errors in trace output after
> run-time is another way of type checking. I don't find it so
> productive.  But it is both popular and respectable,
> since, for example, Python applications on Google App Engine
> work that way. And it does work.
> 
> Most of the time.
> 
> If you develop the skills to guess correctly ...
> 
> So your argument doesn't carry enough weight: Google is big,
> GAE is inexpensive at first, Python is reasonably popular.
> This all shows there *is* something better than
> early bug detection!

I think you just bent the meter needle of my sarcasm
detector, heh heh.

Warren